RESOURCE
ChartLogic: Pricing, Reviews, and Alternatives

ChartLogic: Pricing, Reviews, and Alternatives

ChartLogic is an electronic health records system designed to streamline healthcare tasks without disrupting your workflow. With features like voice dictation, ePrescribe, and customizable note templates, ChartLogic aims to make clinical documentation more efficient. In this article, we'll share the key facts you need to know about ChartLogic to help you make an informed decision on the right EMR for you.

How much does ChartLogic cost?

ChartLogic does not publicly disclose its pricing details online. To get specific information about their costs, you can contact them directly at [email protected]. However, based on industry knowledge, we can provide rough estimates for different healthcare settings and sizes:

Hospitals

  • Small Hospitals (up to 100 beds):
  • Estimated Cost: $1 - $2 million initial setup, plus $400,000 - $700,000 annually for maintenance and support.
  • Medium Hospitals (100 - 500 beds):
  • Estimated Cost: $2 - $9 million initial setup, plus $700,000 - $1.3 million annually.
  • Large Hospitals (over 500 beds):
  • Estimated Cost: $9 - $25 million initial setup, plus $1.3 - $2.5 million annually.

Specialty Groups and Clinics

  • Small Clinics (1-10 providers):
  • Estimated Cost: $150,000 - $450,000 initial setup, plus $80,000 - $220,000 annually.
  • Medium Specialty Groups (10-50 providers):
  • Estimated Cost: $450,000 - $1.8 million initial setup, plus $220,000 - $550,000 annually.
  • Large Specialty Groups (over 50 providers):
  • Estimated Cost: $1.8 - $4.5 million initial setup, plus $550,000 - $1.1 million annually.

Primary Care Practices

  • Small Practices (1-3 providers):
  • Estimated Cost: $80,000 - $250,000 initial setup, plus $40,000 - $130,000 annually.
  • Medium Practices (4-10 providers):
  • Estimated Cost: $250,000 - $600,000 initial setup, plus $130,000 - $270,000 annually.
  • Large Practices (over 10 providers):
  • Estimated Cost: $600,000 - $1.8 million initial setup, plus $270,000 - $550,000 annually.

Rural Health Centers and Community Clinics

  • Small Centers:
  • Estimated Cost: $120,000 - $350,000 initial setup, plus $60,000 - $180,000 annually.
  • Medium Centers:
  • Estimated Cost: $350,000 - $900,000 initial setup, plus $180,000 - $360,000 annually.
  • Large Centers:
  • Estimated Cost: $900,000 - $2.7 million initial setup, plus $360,000 - $720,000 annually.

Other Healthcare Facilities (e.g., Long-term Care, Rehab Centers)

  • Small Facilities:
  • Estimated Cost: $170,000 - $450,000 initial setup, plus $85,000 - $220,000 annually.
  • Medium Facilities:
  • Estimated Cost: $450,000 - $1.3 million initial setup, plus $220,000 - $450,000 annually.
  • Large Facilities:
  • Estimated Cost: $1.3 - $3.5 million initial setup, plus $450,000 - $900,000 annually.

Benefits and differentiators ChartLogic

While ChartLogic has many applications, three key areas are especially noteworthy:

  • Advanced Telehealth Capabilities: Recognizing the growing importance of remote healthcare, ChartLogic includes telehealth features, facilitating virtual patient consultations. This is particularly relevant in the context of increasing demand for remote medical services.
  • Specialty-Specific Customization: ChartLogic is designed to cater to over 40 medical specialties, offering customizable templates that allow healthcare providers to tailor the software to their specific practice needs. This level of specialization is particularly beneficial for practices that require detailed and specific documentation.
  • Efficient Clinical Documentation with Voice Recognition: One of the most notable features is ChartLogic's PrecisionVoice™ technology. It enables healthcare providers to document patient encounters rapidly and accurately using voice dictation, often in less than 90 seconds. This technology streamlines the documentation process without disrupting the provider's workflow.

Scenarios where ChartLogic is a good choice

ChartLogic's EMR shines in a few specific scenarios. It's particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized practices that require a user-friendly and efficient system to streamline clinical documentation and workflow. For practices that prioritize voice dictation capabilities, ChartLogic's voice recognition feature allows for quick and accurate note-taking. Additionally, healthcare organizations that value customizable note templates will find ChartLogic's EMR advantageous, as it enables providers to tailor their documentation to their specific needs and preferences.

Scenarios where ChartLogic may not be a good choice

For healthcare organizations with a strong focus on interoperability and data sharing, ChartLogic's EMR might not be the best fit. These organizations may find that ChartLogic's interoperability capabilities are not as robust as those offered by some other EMR systems, potentially limiting their ability to seamlessly exchange patient information with other healthcare providers. Additionally, large hospitals and healthcare systems that require a comprehensive suite of applications to manage various departments and functions might find ChartLogic's EMR lacking in certain areas. These larger organizations often need more advanced features and modules that ChartLogic may not offer. Finally, healthcare organizations that prioritize advanced analytics and population health management may find ChartLogic's EMR less ideal. These organizations may require more sophisticated data analysis tools and capabilities that ChartLogic's EMR might not provide.

While ChartLogic's strengths lie in its user-friendly interface, voice dictation capabilities, and customizable note templates, these features may not be enough to address the specific needs of organizations that prioritize interoperability, comprehensive application suites, or advanced analytics. In these scenarios, ChartLogic's EMR might not be the most suitable choice.

Reviews of ChartLogic

Users on G2 have given ChartLogic an overall rating of 1.5 out of 5. Below, we've summarized the pros and cons of the EMR as found in the reviews.

Positives in ChartLogic's Reviews

  • User-friendly Interface: Despite the negative review on G2, ChartLogic is known for its user-friendly interface, with some users appreciating its intuitiveness and ease of navigation.
  • Voice Dictation Feature: ChartLogic's voice recognition technology allows for quick and accurate note-taking, which is a significant advantage for many users.
  • Customizable Note Templates: Users value ChartLogic's ability to tailor documentation to their specific needs and preferences through customizable note templates.

Negatives in ChartLogic's Reviews

  • Complexity and Learning Curve: Some users pointed out that ChartLogic's complexity and extensive features can make it relatively difficult to learn and navigate, particularly for new users.
  • Cost and Resource Intensiveness: A few reviews highlighted that implementing and maintaining ChartLogic can be resource-intensive, requiring substantial internal employee involvement and training.
  • Limited Customization in Certain Areas: There were mentions of limitations in health maintenance options and difficulties in certain customizations.

Alternatives to ChartLogic

If ChartLogic's EMR isn't the best fit for your organization, there are alternative EMRs that may better address your needs in the three less ideal scenarios mentioned earlier. Here are two recommendations for each scenario:

Organizations prioritizing interoperability and data sharing

  • Cerner: Cerner's EMR is known for its strong interoperability capabilities, allowing healthcare providers to seamlessly exchange patient information with other systems. This makes it a suitable choice for organizations that prioritize data sharing.
  • Allscripts: Allscripts offers a robust EMR with advanced interoperability features, enabling healthcare organizations to easily share patient data with other providers and systems.

Large hospitals and healthcare systems requiring comprehensive application suites

  • Meditech: Meditech's EMR is designed to cater to the needs of large hospitals and healthcare systems, offering a comprehensive suite of applications to manage various departments and functions.
  • Athenahealth: Athenahealth's EMR provides a wide range of features and modules to support large healthcare organizations, making it a suitable choice for those requiring advanced capabilities and comprehensive application suites.

Organizations prioritizing advanced analytics and population health management

  • eClinicalWorks: eClinicalWorks' EMR offers sophisticated data analysis tools and capabilities, making it an ideal choice for healthcare organizations that prioritize advanced analytics and population health management.
  • NextGen Healthcare: NextGen's EMR provides robust analytics and population health management features, catering to organizations that require more advanced data analysis tools.

How you can use Tennr to get the most out of your EMR

At Tennr, we understand the challenges that come with using an EMR like ChartLogic. That's where we come in! While we're not an EMR ourselves, we excel at integrating with them to automate those pesky, repetitive tasks that bog down your team and business. Our goal is to streamline your processes, making things run more smoothly so you can focus on what truly matters - patient care.

Opportunities for automating EMR tasks

Here are a couple of places in ChartLogic where bringing in Tennr could really help. Check out Tennr and sign up today to explore how we can help you!

Inbound Referrals

We can streamline how you handle incoming referrals in ChartLogic. Tennr uses AI to pull patient details and then RPA (robotic process automation) to set up new patient profiles and book appointments. This not only saves time but also cuts down on those tedious data entry mistakes. Here's a quick demo of how we do this at Tennr! 👇🏾

Explanation of Benefits (EOB) Processing

We also simplify the process of managing incoming EOB (Explanation of Benefits) documents in ChartLogic. Tennr efficiently identifies essential information, such as claim numbers and CPT codes, and seamlessly integrates these payments into the EMR. This enables quicker processing and reduces concerns about inaccuracies in payment details.

Patient scheduling

Small to mid-sized healthcare providers often struggle with managing unstructured external referrals, while larger ones grapple with patient scheduling inefficiencies, especially for follow-up procedures. Tennr addresses this by automating the process using patient demographics. For instance, it sends casual messages with booking links to younger patients and morning calls to older ones, effectively reducing friction and enhancing patient engagement for streamlined scheduling.